Court Discusses “Family Purpose Doctrine” in Recent Car Accident Case

Earlier this month, an appellate court issued a written opinion in a Georgia car accident case requiring the court to discuss the continued applicability of the “family purpose doctrine.” Ultimately, the court found in favor of the plaintiff, holding that the lower court improperly dismissed her case against the owner of a car that was driven by the owner’s grandson when the accident occurred. The Facts of the Case The plaintiff was involved in a Georgia car accident that was allegedly caused by the other motorist. The other motorist was driving his grandfather’s car at the time of the accident. When the plaintiff filed a personal injury lawsuit, she named both the driver of the vehicle as well as the owner as defendants. The plaintiff was unable to locate and serve the driver of the vehicle with notice of the lawsuit, and the court dismissed the driver on that basis. After the driver was dismissed, the owner of the vehicle filed a motion for summary…

Read more detail on Recent Medical Malpractice posts –

Legal notice about the Court Discusses “Family Purpose Doctrine” in Recent Car Accident Case rubric : Hukuki Net Legal News is not responsible for the privacy statements or other content from Web sites outside of the Hukuki.net site. Please refer the progenitor link to check the legal entity of this resource hereinabove.

Do you need High Quality Legal documents or forms related to Court Discusses “Family Purpose Doctrine” in Recent Car Accident Case?

This entry was posted in Medical malpractice law and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply