Law Lessons from MARIANNE PERLSTEIN v. ROSS PERLSTEIN, App. Div., A-4785-08T2, April 26, 2011: A motion for relief from judgment should be granted "sparingly" and in "exceptional situations" in which, "were it not applied, a grave injustice would occur." Hous. Auth. of Morristown v. Little, 135 N.J. 274, 289 (1994). Nevertheless, any decision to grant or deny a motion pursuant to Rule 4:50-1 must be guided by principles of equity. Id. at 283. It is well-established that courts have the equitable authority to "modify property settlement agreements executed in connection with divorce proceedings . . . ." Miller v. Miller, 160 N.J. 408, 418 (1999). "'[A]pplications for relief from equitable distribution provisions contained in a [JOD] are subject to [R. 4:50-1 standard] and not, as in the case of alimony, support, custody, and other matters of continuing jurisdiction of the court, subject to a "changed circumstances" standard.'" Eaton v. Grau, 368 N.J. Super. 215, 222 (App. Div. 2004) (quoting Pressler, Current N.J. Court Rules, comment 1.7 on R. 4:50-1 (2004)). Note: There is a print link embedded within this post, please visit this post to print it. NOTE: This Blog/Blawg, NJ Family Issues, is managed by Paul G. Kostro, Esq., an attorney/lawyer/mediator in Linden, Union County, New Jersey.
Read more detail on Recent Family Law Posts –Legal notice about the Applications for relief from equitable distribution provisions contained in a JOD are subject to R. 4:50-1 standard rubric : Hukuki Net Legal News is not responsible for the privacy statements or other content from Web sites outside of the Hukuki.net site. Please refer the progenitor link to check the legal entity of this resource hereinabove.
Do you need High Quality Legal documents or forms related to Applications for relief from equitable distribution provisions contained in a JOD are subject to R. 4:50-1 standard?