Ancora v HTC: Why You Should Draft Patents That Emphasize Technical Solutions

Last week, in Ancora Technologies v HTC America, the Federal Circuit reversed a lower court’s invalidity ruling under 35 USC §101 by concluding that Ancora’s claimed subject matter was concrete—not abstract—because it assigned specific functions to specific parts of a computer to improve computer security… This case is yet another in a string of post-Alice cases suggesting that patents should be drafted with an emphasis on the technical problem and technical solution delivered by the claims. The post Ancora v HTC: Why You Should Draft Patents That Emphasize Technical Solutions appeared first on IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Patent Law.

Read more detail on Recent Intellectual Property Law posts –

Legal notice about the Ancora v HTC: Why You Should Draft Patents That Emphasize Technical Solutions rubric : Hukuki Net Legal News is not responsible for the privacy statements or other content from Web sites outside of the Hukuki.net site. Please refer the progenitor link to check the legal entity of this resource hereinabove.

Do you need High Quality Legal documents or forms related to Ancora v HTC: Why You Should Draft Patents That Emphasize Technical Solutions?

This entry was posted in Intellectual Property and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply