A Straight-up Victory for States Rights in Regulating Sports Betting

On May 14, 2018 the Supreme Court of the United States released its decision in Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association.  This decision invalidates the key Federal prohibition on State-authorized sports gambling businesses, the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA).  Under PASPA, except in connection with very narrow exemptions, States could not authorize entities to operate, sponsor, or advertise betting, gambling, or wagering businesses that were based on sporting events.  The Court invalidated PASPA because it unconstitutionally regulated that which a State could regulate in violation of our system of “dual sovereignty,” which reserves for the States certain rights to regulate themselves free from Federal intervention.   Citing a variety of sources, including the Declaration of Independence, the Federalist Papers, and notes from the Constitutional Convention, Justice Alito, joined by six other justices and joined in…

Read more detail on Recent Advertising Law posts –

Legal notice about the A Straight-up Victory for States Rights in Regulating Sports Betting rubric : Hukuki Net Legal News is not responsible for the privacy statements or other content from Web sites outside of the Hukuki.net site. Please refer the progenitor link to check the legal entity of this resource hereinabove.

Do you need High Quality Legal documents or forms related to A Straight-up Victory for States Rights in Regulating Sports Betting?

This entry was posted in Advertising Law and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply