2011 Colborn Award – Nominations Now Being Accepted
The Administrative Codes and Registers' Awards Committee is taking nominations for the 2011 Colborn Award. This year, the committee consists of Molly Masich (NC; chair), Elizabeth Palen (VA) and John Martinez (NM). The Colborn Award is presented annually by ACR to recognize a program that demonstrates innovation and creativity in providing public access to, or management of, administrative rules. The nominations packet and form with complete instructions has been posted on the Colborn Award page available at: http://www.administrativerules.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=93&Itemid=56 . The deadline for submitting nominations is Friday, June 10, 2011. Filed under: Colborn Award
Read more detail on Recent Administrative Law Posts –
Legal notice about the 2011 Colborn Award – Nominations Now Being Accepted
rubric : Hukuki Net Legal News is not responsible for the privacy statements or other content from Web sites outside of the Hukuki.net site. Please refer the progenitor link to check the legal entity of this resource hereinabove.
Do you need High Quality Legal documents or forms related to 2011 Colborn Award – Nominations Now Being Accepted?
- NASS Administrative Rules Organization Honors Florida's Division of Library and Information Services as 2011 Robert J. Colborn, Jr. Innovation Award Winner
- Seeking Nominations for the 2008 Spirit of Law Librarianship Award
- 2018 Outstanding Nonprofit Lawyer Award Nominations
- Unsatisfactory rating voided because employee's "performance review," failed to comply with the employer's own procedures and thus undermined the integrity of the process Joyce v City of New York, 2018 NY Slip Op 03433, Appellate Division, First Department The Appellate Division annulled the determination of respondent New York City Department of Education [DOE] sustaining the "unsatisfactory" rating for the 2010-2011 academic year give to John Joyce, a tenured teacher. The court said that the record demonstrates "deficiencies in the performance review process" that resulted in Mr. Joyce being given an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year. Citing Matter of Gumbs v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 125 AD3d 484, and Matter of Richards v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 117 AD3d 605, the Appellate Division noted that these deficiencies "were not merely technical, but undermined the integrity and fairness of the process." Mr. Joyce had received a satisfactory rating for the previous academic year and, in contravention of its own procedures, DOE failed to place him on notice that he was in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year until after April 28, 2011. Although DOE's procedures required that tenured teachers in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating have "formal observations including a pre-observation and post-observation conference by the principal … as part of a prescriptive plan to improve their teaching," Mr. Joyce received only one formal observation which took place one week before the end of the academic year and was not part of a prescriptive plan to improve his performance as a teacher. The decision is posted on the Internet at: http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_03433.htm
- King Accepted as Fraternal Order of Police Legal Plan Attorney
- Arizona SB 1100 Impacts Full and Final Settlements of Accepted Claims
- Senate Judiciary Moves on Nominations, Liu, Sunshine in Courtroom
- DOE Seeks Nominations For Biomass Research And Development Technical Advisory Committee
- Public policy voids arbitrator's award
- Presidential Nominations Sent to the Senate, 9/20/10